Surgical
Options to Treat Obesity
According to the NIH Consensus (1991), some of the indications for weight loss surgery are:
- Morbid Obesity defined as BMI>40 or BMI>35 in the presence of high-risk comorbid conditions
- Patients should also meet the following criteria to be considered for bariatric surgery:
- Failed dietary therapy
- Psychological stability
- Knowledgeable about the operation and its after effects
- Motivation
- Have medical problems that do not preclude likely survival from surgery
Types
of weight loss surgeries available in the U.S.
- Malabsorptive
procedures shorten the digestive tract
- Restrictive
procedures reduce how much the stomach can hold
- Combined
procedures shorten the digestive tract and reduce how much the stomach
can hold
- Revision
| Biliopancreatic
Diversion with or without Duodenal Switch
|
Surgical Options: U.S. Incidence = 5% (Brethauer Clev Clin J Med 2006)
- Weight loss: 70% EWL
- Operative mortality: 1%
- Operative morbidity: 5%
- Long-term complications: diarrhea, malodorous stools and flatus, vitamin, mineral and nutrient deficiencies, in particular, protein deficiency
Buchwald J Am Coll Surg 2005
|
|
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
- Superior weight loss
- Most durable weight loss
- Most difficult to beat
|
- Protein and calcium malnutrition
- Most complicated
- Malodorous stool and flatulence
|
| Vertical
Band Gastroplasty (VBG) |
Surgical
Options: U.S. Incidence = 5% (Brethauer
Clev Clin J Med 2006)
- Weight
loss: 50-60% EWL
- Plateau
in weight loss reached at 2 years
- Operative
mortality: 0.1%
- Operative
morbidity: 5%
- Longterm complications: vomiting, outlet obstruction, erosion, staple line dehiscence
Buchwald
J Am Coll Surg 2005
|
|
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
- Easier
to perform
-
Shorter operative time
|
-
Poor operation for sweet eaters
- Restrictive
only
- Nonadjustable
- Staple
line disruption
and leaks
|
| Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding
|
Surgical Options: U.S. Incidence = 10% (Brethauer Clev Clin J Med 2006)
- Weight loss: 50% EWL at 2 years
- Operative mortality: 0.1%
- Operative morbidity: 5%
- Long-term complications: gastric prolapse, stomal obstruction, esophageal and gastric pouch dilation, gastric erosion and necrosis, access port problems - Buchwald J Am Coll Surg 2005
|
|
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
-
Simple to perform
-
Adjustable
-
Lowest mortality
- Minimally
invasive
- Shortest
operative time
-
No need for vitamin and mineral supplementation
|
- Foreign
body
- Slower
weight loss
- Lower
overall weight loss
- Higher failure rate
- Poor operation for sweet eaters
|
-
A silicone band is placed around the upper part of the stomach
- A
small pouch is created
- Stomach
holds less food
- Induces
feeling of satiety
- Shorter
OR time
- Overnight
hospital stay
- Return
quickly to work
- Evaluated
every 6-8 weeks for gradual tightening if necessary
|
|
| Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Video
|
Adjusting
the Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding The Key to Success
-
Adjustability is the most important attribute
- Filled
with a saline solution
- By
adding or removing the saline, can be made tighter
-
Use it freely
- Adjust
as necessary to support gradual, steady weight loss
- Often
5-6 times in the first year
- Keep
it simple
-
Place reservoir on anterior rectus sheath
-
Palpate, mark the site, no-touch technique
-
Office procedure, rarely needs radiology
|
|
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Results
| O’Brien:
|
57%
EWL at 6 yrs |
| Dargent: |
64%
EWL at 3 yrs |
| Vertruyen: |
52%
EWL at 7 yrs |
| Belachew:
|
50-60%
EWL at 5 yrs |
| Rubenstein: |
54%
EWL at 3 yrs |
| Fox: |
60%
EWL at 4 yrs |
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Complications
- Failure:
20-25%
- Slip:
5.6%
- Erosion: 0.6%
- Access
Port or Tubing Difficulties: 1.7%
- Pulmonary embolism: 0.1%
- Death:
0.05%
| Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
|
First
performed as part of Duodenal Switch procedure 1988 (Marceau/Hess)
- First
performed in laparoscopic isolated form 1999 (Gagner)
- 15
published reports in the surgical literature describing clinical
outcomes in 775 patients
- Risk
appears to be low even in high risk patients
- Complication
rates between 0%-24%
- Overall
mortality rate: 0.39%
- No
consensus of optimal dilator size
- No
study provides data beyond 3 years postoperatively
- BMI
treatment range 35-69
- %EWL
range 33%-83%
- Comorbidity
resolution 1-2 years reported in 345 patients demonstrating resolution
of diabetes, HTN, sleep apnea, dyslipidemia comparable to other
restrictive surgeries
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
- Gastric
restriction without loss of function
- Pylorus
preservation without dumping
- Short
hospital stay
- First
stage for super obese patients
- Useful
for patients with anemia or Crohn's disease
- No
foreign body or adjustment necessary
- No
problems with malabsorbtion
- Reduced
levels of plasma grehlin to induce satiety
|
- Stapling
complications
- Irreversibility
- Lack
of insurance coverage
- No
long term (greater than 5 year published
data)
- Durability
of weight loss/ Need for second stage surgery
|
|
| Gastric
Bypass (Roux-en-Y) |
Surgical Options: U.S. Incidence = 80% (Brethauer Clev Clin J Med 2006)
- Weight loss: 65-70% EWL
- Weight loss plateaus at 1-2 years
- Operative mortality: 0.5%
- Operative morbidity: 5% (pulmonary emboli, anastomotic leak, bleeding, wound infection)
- Long-term complications: Dumping syndrome, stomal stenosis, marginal ulcers, staple line disruption and internal hernias
Life-long Vitamin B12, iron, folate, and calcium supplementaion
Ventral hernia formation is more prevelant after open gastric bypass
Buchwald J Am Coll Surg 2005
|
|
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
- Gold
standard operation in the U.S.
- Dumping
syndrome
- Less
malabsorption
than BPD/DS
-
Rapid weight loss
|
-
Technically more complicated than restrictive operations
-
Need for permanent vitamin and mineral vitamin supplementation
|
| Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
Video
| Dial-Up
connections (You will need Windows
Media Player, a free download)
|
 |
Roux-en-Y Gastric
Bypass
(1.18 MB, Windows Media Player) |
| DSL/Cable
connections (You will need Windows
Media Player, a free download)
|
 |
Roux-en-Y Gastric
Bypass
(7.64 MB, Windows Media Player) |
| If
you're having trouble playing the video, you may not have
the appropriate media player installed. The video you
selected requires a player that can play WMV files, such
as Windows Media Player. It is a free program and can
be downloaded by clicking
here. |
|
|
Roux-en-Y
Techniques
The Roux-en-Y
gastric-bypass can be performed:
- Open
using traditional surgical instrumentation
- Laparoscopic
using advanced surgical minimally invasive instrumentation
- Both
techniques perform the same Roux-en-Y procedure
Open
Gastric Bypass
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
-
Shorter operative time
- Less
OR costs
|
- Incisional hernia
- Wound infection
- Higher pulmonary complications
- Cosmesis
- Pain
- Longer hospital stay
- Slower return to work
- Lifting restrictions
|
Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
- Minimally invasive
- Shorter hospital stay
- Faster return to work and activity
- Lower incidence of pulmonary complications
- Cosmetic
|
- Increased OR costs
- Steep learning curve
|
- Compared with open procedures, laparoscopic gastric bypass has a higher rate of intraabdominal complications; whereas duration of hospitalization is shorter, wound complications are lower, and postoperative patient comfort is higher
Buchwald J Am Coll Surg 2005
|
-
The gastric pouch is formed with the use of a stapler below the
GE junction
- Pouch
size measures 15cc (½ ounce)
|
|
- The
small intestine is divided 40-75 cm from the ligament of Treitz
|
|
- Jejunojejunostomy
is created of variable distance from the end of the Roux limb
- BMI<50
Roux =75cm
-
BMI>50 Roux=150cm
|
|
-
The Roux is attached to the pouch to create the gastrojejunostomy
-
Can be done
-
Hand sewn
-
Linear stapler
-
Circular stapler
|
|
Complications of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
- Conversion: 2.2%
- Bleeding: 0.4%-4%
- Leak: 0%-4.4%
- Wound infection: 2.9%
- Deep vein thrombosis: 0%-1.3%
- Pulmonary Embolism: 0%-1.1%
|
- Strictures: 2%-16%
- Marginal Ulcers: 0.7%-5.1%
- Bowel Obstruction: 3.0%
- Gallstones
- Nutritional deficiencies
- Perioperative death: 0.5%
|
Brethauer
Clev Clin J Med 2006
|
| StomaphyX |
- Can
be used to plicate the gastric pouch to dramatically reduce
the stomach size
- Can
indirectly reduce the size of a dilated anastomosis
- Device
is place through the mouth under direct endoscopic vision
- The
wall of the stomach is suctioned into the device and a prolene
H-shaped fastener is fired creating approximation of the
stomach
- Can
be done as an outpatient or short stay procedure
- Reports
of 50%-90% reduction in stomach size
- No
major complication reported
How
does it Work?
- Tissue
is drawn into the tissue chamber
- Serosafuse
deployed through the plication
StomaphyX Experience
- Procedures are easy
- 20 - 40 minute cases
- Typically14 to 16 fasteners
- Overnight hospital stay or outpatient procedure
- Can create multiple large tissue folds
|
|
| Surgical Options that Dr. Chebli offers |
- Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
- Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding
- Open Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
- Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
- StomaphyX
|
|