Calculate Your BMI
Your height: feet, inches
Your weight: pounds


 


Surgical Options to Treat Obesity

According to the NIH Consensus (1991), some of the indications for weight loss surgery are:

  • Morbid Obesity defined as BMI>40 or BMI>35 in the presence of high-risk comorbid conditions
  • Patients should also meet the following criteria to be considered for bariatric surgery:
    • Failed dietary therapy
    • Psychological stability
    • Knowledgeable about the operation and its after effects
    • Motivation
    • Have medical problems that do not preclude likely survival from surgery

Types of weight loss surgeries available in the U.S.

Biliopancreatic Diversion with or without Duodenal Switch

Surgical Options: U.S. Incidence = 5% (Brethauer Clev Clin J Med 2006)

  • Weight loss: 70% EWL
  • Operative mortality: 1%
  • Operative morbidity: 5%
  • Long-term complications: diarrhea, malodorous stools and flatus, vitamin, mineral and nutrient deficiencies, in particular, protein deficiency
    Buchwald J Am Coll Surg 2005

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Superior weight loss
  • Most durable weight loss
  • Most difficult to beat
  • Protein and calcium malnutrition
  • Most complicated
  • Malodorous stool and flatulence

 

Vertical Band Gastroplasty (VBG)

Surgical Options: U.S. Incidence = 5% (Brethauer Clev Clin J Med 2006)

  • Weight loss: 50-60% EWL
  • Plateau in weight loss reached at 2 years
  • Operative mortality: 0.1%
  • Operative morbidity: 5%
  • Longterm complications: vomiting, outlet obstruction, erosion, staple line dehiscence
    Buchwald J Am Coll Surg 2005

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Easier to perform
  • Shorter operative time
  • Poor operation for sweet eaters
  • Restrictive only
  • Nonadjustable
  • Staple line disruption
    and leaks

 

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding

Surgical Options: U.S. Incidence = 10% (Brethauer Clev Clin J Med 2006)

  • Weight loss: 50% EWL at 2 years
  • Operative mortality: 0.1%
  • Operative morbidity: 5%
  • Long-term complications: gastric prolapse, stomal obstruction, esophageal and gastric pouch dilation, gastric erosion and necrosis, access port problems - Buchwald J Am Coll Surg 2005

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Simple to perform
  • Adjustable
  • Lowest mortality
  • Minimally invasive
  • Shortest operative time
  • No need for vitamin and mineral supplementation
  • Foreign body
  • Slower weight loss
  • Lower overall weight loss
  • Higher failure rate
  • Poor operation for sweet eaters
  • A silicone band is placed around the upper part of the stomach
    • A small pouch is created
    • Stomach holds less food
    • Induces feeling of satiety
    • Shorter OR time
    • Overnight hospital stay
    • Return quickly to work
    • Evaluated every 6-8 weeks for gradual tightening if necessary

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Video

Dial-Up connections (You will need Windows Media Player, a free download)
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding
(344 kb, Windows Media Player)
DSL/Cable connections (You will need Windows Media Player, a free download)
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding
(4.03 MB, Windows Media Player)
If you're having trouble playing the video, you may not have the appropriate media player installed. The video you selected requires a player that can play WMV files, such as Windows Media Player. It is a free program and can be downloaded by clicking here.

 

Adjusting the Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding The Key to Success

  • Adjustability is the most important attribute
    • Filled with a saline solution
    • By adding or removing the saline, can be made tighter
  • Use it freely
    • Adjust as necessary to support gradual, steady weight loss
    • Often 5-6 times in the first year
  • Keep it simple
    • Place reservoir on anterior rectus sheath
    • Palpate, mark the site, no-touch technique
    • Office procedure, rarely needs radiology

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Results

O’Brien: 57% EWL at 6 yrs
Dargent: 64% EWL at 3 yrs
Vertruyen: 52% EWL at 7 yrs
Belachew: 50-60% EWL at 5 yrs
Rubenstein: 54% EWL at 3 yrs
Fox: 60% EWL at 4 yrs

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Complications

  • Failure: 20-25%
  • Slip: 5.6%
  • Erosion: 0.6%
  • Access Port or Tubing Difficulties: 1.7%
  • Pulmonary embolism: 0.1%
  • Death: 0.05%
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
  • First performed as part of Duodenal Switch procedure 1988 (Marceau/Hess)
  • First performed in laparoscopic isolated form 1999 (Gagner)
  • 15 published reports in the surgical literature describing clinical outcomes in 775 patients
  • Risk appears to be low even in high risk patients
  • Complication rates between 0%-24%
  • Overall mortality rate: 0.39%
  • No consensus of optimal dilator size
  • No study provides data beyond 3 years postoperatively
  • BMI treatment range 35-69
  • %EWL range 33%-83%
  • Comorbidity resolution 1-2 years reported in 345 patients demonstrating resolution of diabetes, HTN, sleep apnea, dyslipidemia comparable to other restrictive surgeries

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Gastric restriction without loss of function
  • Pylorus preservation without dumping
  • Short hospital stay
  • First stage for super obese patients
  • Useful for patients with anemia or Crohn's disease
  • No foreign body or adjustment necessary
  • No problems with malabsorbtion
  • Reduced levels of plasma grehlin to induce satiety
  • Stapling complications
  • Irreversibility
  • Lack of insurance coverage
  • No long term (greater than 5 year published data)
  • Durability of weight loss/ Need for second stage surgery

 

Gastric Bypass (Roux-en-Y)

Surgical Options: U.S. Incidence = 80% (Brethauer Clev Clin J Med 2006)

  • Weight loss: 65-70% EWL
  • Weight loss plateaus at 1-2 years
  • Operative mortality: 0.5%
  • Operative morbidity: 5% (pulmonary emboli, anastomotic leak, bleeding, wound infection)
  • Long-term complications: Dumping syndrome, stomal stenosis, marginal ulcers, staple line disruption and internal hernias
    Life-long Vitamin B12, iron, folate, and calcium supplementaion
    Ventral hernia formation is more prevelant after open gastric bypass

    Buchwald J Am Coll Surg 2005

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Gold standard operation in the U.S.
  • Dumping syndrome
  • Less malabsorption
    than BPD/DS
  • Rapid weight loss
  • Technically more complicated than restrictive operations
  • Need for permanent vitamin and mineral vitamin supplementation

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Video

Dial-Up connections (You will need Windows Media Player, a free download)
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
(1.18 MB, Windows Media Player)
DSL/Cable connections (You will need Windows Media Player, a free download)
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
(7.64 MB, Windows Media Player)
If you're having trouble playing the video, you may not have the appropriate media player installed. The video you selected requires a player that can play WMV files, such as Windows Media Player. It is a free program and can be downloaded by clicking here.

Roux-en-Y Techniques

The Roux-en-Y gastric-bypass can be performed:

  • Open using traditional surgical instrumentation
  • Laparoscopic using advanced surgical minimally invasive instrumentation
  • Both techniques perform the same Roux-en-Y procedure

Open Gastric Bypass

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Shorter operative time
  • Less OR costs
  • Incisional hernia
  • Wound infection
  • Higher pulmonary complications
  • Cosmesis
  • Pain
  • Longer hospital stay
  • Slower return to work
  • Lifting restrictions


Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Minimally invasive
  • Shorter hospital stay
  • Faster return to work and activity
  • Lower incidence of pulmonary complications
  • Cosmetic
  • Increased OR costs
  • Steep learning curve
  • Compared with open procedures, laparoscopic gastric bypass has a higher rate of intraabdominal complications; whereas duration of hospitalization is shorter, wound complications are lower, and postoperative patient comfort is higher
    Buchwald J Am Coll Surg 2005
  • The gastric pouch is formed with the use of a stapler below the GE junction
  • Pouch size measures 15cc (½ ounce)
  • The small intestine is divided 40-75 cm from the ligament of Treitz
  • Jejunojejunostomy is created of variable distance from the end of the Roux limb
  • BMI<50 Roux =75cm
  • BMI>50 Roux=150cm
  • The Roux is attached to the pouch to create the gastrojejunostomy
  • Can be done
    • Hand sewn
    • Linear stapler
    • Circular stapler

Complications of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

  • Conversion: 2.2%
  • Bleeding: 0.4%-4%
  • Leak: 0%-4.4%
  • Wound infection: 2.9%
  • Deep vein thrombosis: 0%-1.3%
  • Pulmonary Embolism: 0%-1.1%
  • Strictures: 2%-16%
  • Marginal Ulcers: 0.7%-5.1%
  • Bowel Obstruction: 3.0%
  • Gallstones
  • Nutritional deficiencies
  • Perioperative death: 0.5%

Brethauer Clev Clin J Med 2006
 

StomaphyX
  • Can be used to plicate the gastric pouch to dramatically reduce the stomach size
  • Can indirectly reduce the size of a dilated anastomosis
  • Device is place through the mouth under direct endoscopic vision
  • The wall of the stomach is suctioned into the device and a prolene H-shaped fastener is fired creating approximation of the stomach
  • Can be done as an outpatient or short stay procedure
  • Reports of 50%-90% reduction in stomach size
  • No major complication reported
How does it Work?
  • Tissue is drawn into the tissue chamber
  • Serosafuse deployed through the plication
StomaphyX Experience
  • Procedures are easy
  • 20 - 40 minute cases
  • Typically14 to 16 fasteners
  • Overnight hospital stay or outpatient procedure
  • Can create multiple large tissue folds

Surgical Options that Dr. Chebli offers
  • Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
  • Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding
  • Open Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
  • Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
  • StomaphyX